Page 4 |
|
|
Music: |
|
Could events portrayed in movies
like "Deep Impact" become a reality?
One movie that caught my attention some years ago was
"Deep
Impact". I realize that it was just a movie,
yet experts have determined that comets, meteors and asteroids
have hit the earth in past millennia. They have predicted
that the probability of it happening again is certain,
the question has always been "when"? Events
like the Yucatan impact
which created the chicicxulub crater
that was discovered in 1990 could have been responsible
for the demise of the dinosaurs. This was a world-wide
cataclysmic event that dramatically changed the earth.
The impact probably caused a global firestorm
and the suns light was blocked for unknown weeks, months,
years which caused most plant life on earth to die. Not
only did mass numbers of animals die from the immediate
effects of the blast, but countless more died from starvation
and lack of oxygen which was effected by the change in
air composition due to the impact. These effects lasted
for years, perhaps decades. Archaeologists had long struggled
to understand why material had been found in layers of
substrata which suggested abrupt events happening leaving
these layers of deposits found in excavations. They called
this layer the "K2" boundary separating one
age from another.
|
Countless
animals and fauna were also destroyed when unimaginable
Tsunami's wiped the remaining land masses clean. A big
question about such events would be.... Is there something,
some force that drags space bodies/debris into the earth
on a regular schedule? If so, could ancient descriptions
of this force & collaborations that extinction level
events took place in the past point to a cycle that is
consistent through the ages? It is possible (considering
the varying degrees of chance) that each flyby caused
different outcomes based on what space debris
Nibiru dragged to earth. Planets in the outer solar system
have possibly seen collisions that helped "design"
the current solar system we know of today.
There are theories that our solar system had at least
one other planet which was pulverized by a huge impact
creating the asteroid belt. Many of the craters on the
moon and mars for example are unexplainable because to
date very few impacts have been witnessed, yet there are
thousands. Could these scars have been caused by impacts
from previous flybys of Niribu? What will people say when
they see it again in the sky?
|
|
Some
time
ago, the western vision of the past saw an earth that
had been created a few thousand years ago, and had been
shaped since that time by a number of global cataclysms.
This view gradually gave way to the consensus that the
earth was several billion years old, and that its features
reflected the slow processes of gradual change. Since
1970, this view has gradually changed to accommodate
the evidence that the earth has in fact gone through
periods of abrupt and catastrophic changes.
The fact that this modified understanding of the earth's
history did not emerge until recently seems surprising.
Why did this new point of view come about in a relatively
short period of time? Were there unknown forces working
in the background that helped mold these views? Is science
the final "answer" to these questions?
Although
it might be assumed that a major impact on the earth
would leave behind absolutely unmistakable evidence,
in fact the gradual processes that change the surface
of the earth tend to cover the effects of impacts. Erosion
by wind and water, deposits of wind-blown sand and water-carried
sediment, and lava flows in due time tend to obscure
or bury the craters left by impacts. However, some evidence
remains, and over 150 major craters have been identified
on the earth. Studies of these craters have allowed
geologists to find the remaining traces
of other
craters that have mostly been obliterated.
There
was an article in the New York Times dated March 11,
2003 which stated that new evidence is pointing to the
possibility that a "Shower" of meteors likely
hit the earth causing these features and effects.
|
|
|
It reads
in part "Scientists
are arguing again over the idea that the combination of
cataclysms that doomed the dinosaurs -- titanic volcanic
eruptions in India and a meteor impact off the coast of
Mexico -- may not have been a coincidence after all.
For decades, some geologists have theorized that the force
of an extraterrestrial rock crashing into Earth could
have cracked its crust thousands of miles away allowing
molten lava to spill out from the interior. But no one
has yet found any solid evidence.
Now
researchers at University College London are suggesting
that the Indian lava flows are the impact site of an earlier,
larger meteor, and that evidence of the impact was submerged
by upwelling lava. In this view, the mass extinction of
dinosaurs and other creatures was caused not by a single
meteor, but by a barrage of them. The
new work is provoking another burst of theories and debate
over the demise of the dinosaurs, which has never been
explained to everyone's agreement." The full story
can be read here.
|
|
The
position that multiple events took place considerably
strengthens the possibility that some powerful force caused
these events. The mere force of Nibirus' gravitational
effect explains most of them as well as the probability
that it dragged debris into the atmosphere which rained
down on practically every area of earths surface. Some
discoveries that have been kept relatively quite in the
scientific community (for obvious reasons) would cast
serious doubts on the timelines of when the dinosaurs
roamed the earth and when man made his appearance.
|
|
